« July 2008 | Main | September 2008 »

August 29, 2008

On Becoming A Person: This is Me

A friend lent me this book by Carl Rogers, and after reading a few chapters, I find that the book can be life-changing.

I can say that the first chapter "This is Me" was very simple, the one thing that I got out from it was really "Be yourself". But it's more than just a trite expression. It's the explanation that intrigued and fascinated me.

The following is a summary of the learnings in the essay entitled "This is Me". Some of the sentences are condensed versions and some of them are in my own words.

In my relationships with persons I have found that it does not help, in the long run, to act as though I were something that I am not. Trying to maintain a facade isn't helpful. Being sad when you are happy. Being loving when you are hostile. Being well when you are ill.

I find I am more effective when I can listen acceptantly to myself, and can be myself. Realize when you are angry, when you are rejecting. It becomes easier for me to accept myself as a decidedly imperfect person, who by no means functions at all times in the way in which I would like to function. When I accept myself as I am, then I change. Another result is also that relationships also become real, vital and meaningful.

I have found it of enormous value when I can permit myself to understand another person. The word "permit" is pivotal because we risk changing ourselves when we truly understand someone else. That's why it's easier to judge than to understand. Permitting yourself to understand permits the other to accept their own fears and bizarre thoughts.

I have found it enriching to open channels whereby others can communicate their feelings, their private perceptual worlds, to me. By reducing the barriers, communication and understanding increases, which is highly rewarding.

I have found it highly rewarding when I can accept another person. Can I accept his anger, his hostility as a real and legitimate part of himself? Can I accept that he feels and thinks differently from me? Each person is an island unto himself; and he can only build bridges to other islands if he is first of all willing to be himself and permitted to be himself.

The more I am open to the realities in me and in the other person, the less do I find myself wishing to rush in to "fix things." It is a paradox, the more each one of us is willing to be himself, then he finds not only himself changing; but he finds that other people to whom he relates are also changing.

On Actions and Values:

I can trust my experience. Trust in yourself. Your total organismic sensing of a situation is more trustworthy than your intellect. (Nico: In other words, "use the force, Luke")

Evaluation by others is not a guide for me. At times you will be called a fraud and other times a genius. Only one person knows whether you are false or true, and that is you. Praise and criticism is evidence brought before you. But the person who weighs it is you.

Experience is, for me, the highest authority. It isn't infallible, but it is the basis of authority in which to check and is open to correction.

I enjoy the discovering of order in experience. It is used to make sense of what's happening, to satisfy a need for meaning inside.

The facts are friendly. Feedback can be painful, but it is essential to learning.

What is most personal is general. What personal experience you think happens sometimes surprises you to be common with everyone.

It has been my experience that persons have a basically positive direction. Most people do. It is not to deny the fact that there are monsters in society who are cruel, and hurtful, but underneath in the deepest levels there is something that struggles towards the light.

Life, at its best, is a flowing, changing process in which nothing is fixed. Let the flow of experience carry you, in a direction that seems forward, but towards goals which we are only dimly aware. Life is a process of becoming.

August 25, 2008

Use of Words

I am not a philologist or linguist, but I believe that our words and vocabulary do shape our attitudes and behaviour.

Fro example, in society, when words like negro and gentile are not used in everyday speech, perhaps that is a sign of progress of racial integration.

As long as words like kafir, and murtad are used to describe other people, we will not be able to see each other as fellow human beings but as "us" and "them".

In personal use, instead of using terms like "Christian", "Muslim" or "Buddhist", perhaps we should use phrases like "Seeker of Truth", "Follower of the Way", "Lover of God". It actually makes a difference! I actually said those phrases out loud, and there was a difference in my attitude, my reaction, my spinal cord, my posture.

August 21, 2008

Tech Break: Realistic Mo-Cap

This is one of the most amazing demos of the future of motion capture (mocap). The above video is of a computer simulation. It is not a real person!

Instead of sticking tiny reflective stickers on a persons face, a simple video capture is used and then analyzed.

The movements are then mapped onto your computer simulated model.

Reminds me of the movie S1m0ne that starred Al Pacino. But even darker, we can think of Wag the Dog and Johnny Mnemonic where computer simulations are used to trick people.

This technology created by Image Metrics.

The technology will not replace actors entirely, but more likely good-looking bad actors. You still need a good actor who can emote with facial expression well, but he needn't be just the right face.

August 18, 2008

Nuggets Food of Champions


Nuggets Food of Champions
Originally uploaded by nicodemus_chan.
This is what Usain Bolt ate before winning his 100m race in world record time: Chicken McNuggets.

August 17, 2008

Dangers of Singapore Winning Gold

Today, the Singapore women's team will be competing against China for the team table tennis gold medal at the Beijing Olympics.

The only question on my mind is will Singapore be beaten 3-0 or 3-1? (To stretch the event to 5 matches is unthinkable).

Punditry aside, it's actually more dangerous for Singapore to beat China.

Why? Because Singapore is like (as others have said) China's B team. All the team members were recruited from China. 1999, 2007 and 2008 being the years they became Singapore citizens.

If Singapore do win, Singapore will have lost the talent pool on which to draw from more talent. China will surely shut the door on Singapore. "We made a mistake. We shouldn't have let them poach any of our table tennis players. We won't make the same mistake again."

It's just my opinion.

August 13, 2008

Believing in God is a serious thing

I wrote a few days ago that either God doesn't love us or he does love us. Not just love us a little, 50%, 99% but 100%.

I also realize now that:


  • Believing in God is a serious thing.

  • Believing in a God who is interested in us is even more serious.

  • Believing in a God who is interested in us and loves us that he would be willing to do anything, even die for us is totally awesome.

If we believe in a God who is interested even in the most minute thing that we do, think or say, then it stands to reason that I must be very careful at every moment what I do say or think. From the very moment that I wake up and every decision that I make, this sentient being, this presence is quite aware of what I am doing, how I am doing it, my motives and the attitudes behind it.

In a way, it is just like the Heisenberg uncertainty theorem. Because I believe that there is an observer, what is observed is affected.

But the thing is, God is more than just a passive observer, he is also an active participant in my life. At times yes, he may seem silent, but he is always there. And if we believe that he is truly interested in us, and loving us, we can ask him for anything that we want.

With such knowledge, therefore, it stands to reason that we are truly more than conquerors, that there is nothing that we cannot overcome in life.

Therefore believing in an almighty and loving God must change our lives. It is the only logical consequence. So do we really, really, really, really believe in God?

Because if I do, I can't stand around anymore wasting my life. I can't get away with a careless remark, or an unloving gesture and hope that He is pleased. (Yes, he still loves me, but I'm quite sure he isn't pleased). It also means that I can walk around with confidence and my head held high, because I am his child. That I am not a loser. That I am free, that the whole world is mine because of His love.

Believing and experiencing are two different things. Like Carl Rogers wrote, It's quite alright to teach a child that two and two is four. But it is a different matter altogether for the child when he experiences with blocks that two and two really is four.

August 10, 2008

Another Way To Protest Surreptitiously

Activist tries to show Tibetan flag at Olympic venue (http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/08/09/hong.kong.olympics.protest.ap/index.html)

Unfortunately for this lady, she was caught. (And you can see the guard even managed to molest her as well.)

I suggest another way of doing it, where you can feign ignorance.

Get 9 friends each to wear the following T-Shirts:












(You can buy these t-shirts here: http://www.cafepress.com/channico/)


When you have the opportune time, arrange yourself in the proper order when the television cameras are on you.

If the police catch you, just rearrange your seating and ask "What's the problem officer?"

Heck, you can even have fun creating anagrams:

Bee Fitter.
Bitter Fee.
Be Tit Free.
Bet It Free.
Feet Biter.
Tie Bereft.
Feet Tribe.

August 9, 2008

View from Starbucks for NDP 2008

Am sitting at Starbucks Marina Square with (hopefully) a glimpse of the fireworks for Singapore's National Day Parade.

August 8, 2008

Malaysian Olympic Observation

It's an interesting observation that out of the 33 Malaysian athletes going to the Beijing Olympics, 23 out of the 33 are Chinese. That's 66%. (Even though 26% of the population of Malaysia are Chinese).

At least meritocracy is alive in the arena of sports in Malaysia. Imagine if they had quotas on the racial composition of the Olympic contingent.

August 2, 2008

The Only Difference...

Imagine that we were all given the powers of gods. Imagine that we had the power to have anything that we ever wanted, all our needs were taken care of, our hunger, our sexual needs, our housing, our pleasure, everything.

What else would there be to do?

But just having the power of a god doesn't make us any more divine. What is the difference between Superman and Darkseid (or insert your favourite super-villain here).

It isn't the powers.

Superman isn't superman just because of his powers. He's superman because of what he stands for and what he does.

If we did have the power of gods and everyone around us had the same powers, there would be nothing left to do. We would have all the knowledge, all the power, but then we would live in our own worlds, we could create our own fantasies to live in, locking ourselves from others. Nobody could harm us. And we could never harm anyone else.

That's why love is the thing that remains. Love breaks us from our own world. Love gets us in touch with another sentient being.

So therefore, the only thing that makes me different at each moment is whether I do it in love. Love allows us to take part in the divine nature. If we were all gods, how then could we show love to one another? Perhaps then the gift of humanity is it's incompleteness. That we all have needs. Once we meet someone else with needs, we can show our love for them, and they for us in our own needs.

If there were no needs in our life, no one could show us love. And if there were no needs in others, we would have no one else to show love to.

Friendster Profile FOAF Best Blogs in Asia Movable Type 4.1
eXTReMe Tracker